Two methods for writing a paper outline: Answering questions and listing topic sentences – Raul Pacheco-Vega, PhD

Since I usually write blog posts by request, unless there’s a pressing thought that I really want to get out and get off my chest, I normally make a list of what I’m supposed to be blogging about. A topic that I saw people insisting upon was the question of how to write an outline for a paper. The process can be escalated to a book, or a doctoral dissertation, a Masters thesis, or an undergraduate honors major paper.

I use a couple of methods, and in this post, I discuss two methods I use. Both are inquiry-focused, but in one I set up questions, whereas in the other I basically throw words or sentences and then list and group them to see if they make a coherent argument when assembled. There are, as I mention in my Twitter thread (which you can open by clicking anywhere on the tweet below) other methods, such as IMRAD, Introduction – Body – Conclusion, etc. Mine are just two methods, and hopefully they may be of use to others who are interested in writing outlines for their papers, books and dissertations.

My Twitter thread began here (you can click anywhere on the tweet, and the thread will expand and open in a new window – scroll down all the way to the end to read the entire thread and people’s responses):

People have asked me how write how I outline a paper. I use a couple of methods. First one is asking questions. pic.twitter.com/x1PYVelDf8

— Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega (@raulpacheco) March 11, 2018

1. ASKING QUESTIONS

I tend to dialogue with myself, and I use writing as a form of conversation, where I am the interlocutor and the speaker too. In the example I posted, where I shared the outline for my ethnographic methods in public policy analysis chapter, I asked questions that can become sections of the paper.

Note how the questions I ask may end up becoming sections of my chapter. Also, as I assemble my paper, I write memorandums for each one of these questions. https://t.co/QtktllEpGs this process makes it easier for me to build the entire paper.

— Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega (@raulpacheco) March 11, 2018

When I ask questions to myself, I usually add anything that can help me create sentences and paragraphs. For example, in the tweet below, I have used those questions as prompts to force me out of a writing rut.

Continuation of my “outlines” thread: I have mentioned how I use the Questions Method to create an outline. I also use it to prompt my #AcWri – here are two questions I’m working on for my publicness paper pic.twitter.com/e5IssHbJC0

— Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega (@raulpacheco) March 15, 2018

Note that each question could be a separate memorandum https://t.co/hACSfxW6Y4 BUT I just realized these were questions that I could answer in the paper BECAUSE I was writing a memo on a related topic (how sanitation is a public issue). Still, worth answering those questions.

— Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega (@raulpacheco) March 15, 2018

2. WORD SALAD + LIST OF TOPIC SENTENCES + FEEDBACK

This method works really well for me, as I ask for feedback from fellow academics very early in the process. What I did with my paper on the global governance of plastics was that I wrote a list of ideas I had, a list of topic sentences from where I could create entire paragraphs, I gave it some coherence, and asked for feedback from Dr. Robin Nagle and Dr. Kate O’Neill, both experts on waste.

Armed with printed version of @rznagle@kmoneill2530 emails offering feedback, I re-thought my outline, fleshed out a few ideas. pic.twitter.com/c1GguKUZgI

— Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega (@raulpacheco) March 14, 2018

I am a big fan of conceptual maps (also known as mind maps). I usually draw them in different colours and I use them to connect ideas, concepts and authors. For example here, I more or less have drawn the connections between local, national and international environmental regulation of plastics, thanks to the feedback Robin and Kate offered.

Even if not fully fleshed out, I can now build a logical, sequential argument/analysis of plastic regulation across scales and media. pic.twitter.com/WD5JRjsujZ

— Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega (@raulpacheco) March 14, 2018

I don’t think there’s anything wrong with having a conversation with oneself on paper, especially when we are at the early stages of composition. I try to always write topic sentences that can have one idea, and then flesh out that idea by assembling additional written sentences until they form an entire paragraph.

Continuation of my “outlines” thread, and a bit on topic sentences. Note how I basically throw “word salad” in the form of “topic sentences” (also, I cite @chelseawald too!) pic.twitter.com/1nBB91u6Nj

— Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega (@raulpacheco) March 16, 2018

The “Listing Topic Sentences” method works very well for me when I know the literature so well that I can use it to write topic sentences that I can then flesh out. For example, in this case I link my own work with that of Dr. Malini Ranganathan and Dr. Colin McFarlane. We all three have written about informal sanitation mechanisms.

One thing I also do is to write topic sentences that link concepts with the literature (and citations associated with them). Notice how I link my own work with that of @ColinMcFarlane3 and @maliniranga (we all have written on informality in water and sanitation). pic.twitter.com/8sPcNs7Q0a

— Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega (@raulpacheco) March 16, 2018

Topic sentences work wonderfully for my writing because they act as prompts or anchors from where I can spin off the thread that will compose my entire argument.

And if you need a push – Five strategies to get your academic writing “unstuck” https://t.co/vQucfRgq8D via @LSEImpactBlog

— Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega (@raulpacheco) March 16, 2018

This is another example that is a variation from the Listing Topic Sentences, which is Listing Key Ideas.

On topic sentences and paper outlines (continuation of thread) – I also use another method: Listing Key Ideas. I write by hand core concepts pic.twitter.com/QItibaTBbO

— Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega (@raulpacheco) March 17, 2018

Do note how in the previous case, each concept is one sentence, whereas in the case below, I have a more well thought out idea of what I want to say.

Some ideas are “raw” right now but others are *slightly* more developed. Here, I consider cross-scalar dynamics in environmental regulation pic.twitter.com/uPiMGKzcEg

— Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega (@raulpacheco) March 17, 2018

I always keep going back-and-forth between my paper, my Everything Notebook and my handwritten conceptual maps. Doing this allows me to maintain control over my ideas and grasp what I’m trying to understand more clearly.

Upon reflection (bear with me, I am under-caffeinated), I can link these ideas to @helgej_ ‘s work on policy convergence & @PeterDauvergne ‘s pic.twitter.com/ymNHzZWuXD

— Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega (@raulpacheco) March 17, 2018

The pair of tweets below clearly summarize my approach.

To summarize: outlining a paper provides the author with a skeleton of ideas that can later be fleshed out. Having a flexible structure (where you combine the Questions Method with Key Ideas Method) and using mind maps/concept maps helps me clarify my own thinking.

— Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega (@raulpacheco) March 17, 2018

One final thought: research is social, contrary to what you hear. When you write, you put ideas down that (if you submit them to a peer reviewed journal) somebody else needs to read and understand. Therefore, the earlier you can share your drafts with fellow scholars, the better developed your argument.

Hopefully my method will be useful to students, early career scholars and other fellow academics and writers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *